Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HurkinMcGurkin
"It seems that only Moore's monument is being singled out here. Yeh, by Moore."

No, by the lady who chose to play the 'victim' and be 'offended' by the monument (while she chooses not to be offended by statues of Greek and Roman gods in governmental buildings). And by the federal judge who has decided this monument must be removed, but the memorials to 'law givers' in the SCOTUS building are just fine (as are all those memorials to Greek and Roman gods).

You wouldn't have heard from Moore if there wasn't an unconstitutional effort to stifle certain expressions in only certain cases.

102 posted on 08/28/2003 2:12:20 PM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: MEGoody
Oh yeah, about that li'l lady that was "offended"... In the court's opinion that plaintiff Maddox is referred to by others and even herself as "the tiny tiger"; and that plaintiff Howard identifies herself as a political independent. Surely she is a hypersensitive little tiger and political independent. Found on p.19 of the opinion.
162 posted on 08/29/2003 2:26:46 PM PDT by PleaseNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson