None of those judges relied on the doctrine of "separation of church and state." Those who claim they did are either (a) misinformed or (b) trying to mislead. The point is, the feds simply did not have jurisdiction in this matter under the 10th. Whatever powers or rights cited in this case were created from whole cloth, not the Constitution.
"Whatever powers or rights cited in this case were created from whole cloth, not the Constitution."
How would you know that if you don't know what they relied upon?