Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quidnunc
The Fourteenth Amendment's relative section states: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

Now how does keeping a monument to the Ten Commandments 'make or enforce a law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States?' I'm sure that you have to go through YEARS of Constitutional Law before that connection makes sense!

242 posted on 08/28/2003 7:36:19 PM PDT by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: JoeSchem
Without going through years of constitutional law (which is often misinterpreted even today), what specific federal or state law did Judge Moore violate by remaining faithful to his oath to defend the Alabama and United States Constitutions?

Is it really, really all that deep? Mysterious? Technical?

243 posted on 08/28/2003 7:42:27 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (LIBERTY has arrived in Iraq - Now we can concentrate on HOLLYWEED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

To: JoeSchem
JoeSchem wrote: The Fourteenth Amendment's relative section states: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Now how does keeping a monument to the Ten Commandments 'make or enforce a law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States?' I'm sure that you have to go through YEARS of Constitutional Law before that connection makes sense!

The Equal Protection clause of the 14th makes states — including their constitutions and other laws — subject to the provisions of the US Constitution.

244 posted on 08/28/2003 7:42:27 PM PDT by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

To: JoeSchem
The claim is that the 14th Amendment's guarantee of "due process of law" applies some -- but not all -- of the guarantees of the Bill of Rights to the states, and that the Ten Commandments monument violates the guarantee of no establishment of religion.

What? You don't find that very persuasive? Neither do I.

246 posted on 08/28/2003 7:54:29 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson