Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lugsoul
"Now, concerning the meat of the argument, this rock inscribed with words and images is no different than anything other publically funded rock inscribed with words and images" . . .This statement is in direct conflict with Judge Roy's sworn testimony about the Rock.

So leaving your personal feelings about Judge Moore aside, you now agree that the public artwork should stay?

206 posted on 08/28/2003 6:26:32 PM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]


To: Tribune7
It is not public artwork. Not according to the man who put it there.

It is remarkable that so many people will so readily discard the whole idea of intent on this issue. Intent is a fundamental characteristic of our most basic law. Without intent, there would be no distinction between murder and self-defense. Without intent, there would be no distinction between burning a flag to dispose of it and burning a flag to express hatred for the U.S.

Intent matters under the law of the land, and under the law of God. The Tenth Commandment is about nothing but intent.

213 posted on 08/28/2003 6:34:50 PM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson