If you look at 1992 when conservative Bruce Herschensohn and moderate John Seymour were running for the two US Senate seats that were open you will notice that Herschensohn came within a whisker of beating Boxer, thanks to a last-minute dirty trick, but Seymour lost by a huge margin on the same ballot with the same group of voters.
If I had the time I could go on and on about 98, 2000, 2002, and how moderate nominees get beaten really badly and conservative's lose by small margins. In 2002 the party establishment threw about amillion dollars at the end to really liberal Republican Gary Mendoza running for Insurance Commissioner, who lost substantially. Everyone flipped the bird at McClintock who came within a fraction of a percent of winning.
how moderate nominees get beaten really badly and conservative's lose by small margins
Thanks for posting this, it really proves something the supposedly-misguided Arnold supporters have been pointing out. Moderates get beaten badly and conservatives only lose by small margins? This can only be happening if these masses of "pure" conservatives are withholding votes from any moderate Republicans. A political party is a coalition... if one portion refuses to work with the rest, you have only yourselves to blame for the failure of the entire effort.
Imagine how less damaged California would be if socialism hadn't had an almost entirely free reign for the last decade. Imagine how much easier it would be to sell "pure" conservative ideals RIGHT NOW to liberal voters who had felt comfortable voting for moderate Republicans in the last few elections. McClintock would probably have won last year...