Skip to comments.
Narcissist, metrosexual, call us what you like, we're out and proud
Sydney Morning Herald ^
| August 29, 2003
| Matt Martyn-Jones
Posted on 08/28/2003 11:28:54 AM PDT by presidio9
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
To: snowstorm12
Guys who hate "metrosexuals" are a bunch of ugly, envious, washed up, short, old, fat, hairy disgusting unhygienic males who can't goom themselves and are extremely jealous of gorgeous, sexy, well groomed, interesting men so they attack their masculinity or call them gay. I see it all the time. BINGO! I get called "gay" all the time - usually when I'm in a bar and just taken away the interest of some woman from some average -looking macho joe. What is it about being well-dressed, slim, fit and with good hair that defines a man as allegedly gay? Often this slur is followed up by further agressive treatment and I'm pretty sick of it.
Guys need to get with the picture: the prettier, better-dressed guy is going to get the woman while the rest of you gather round for a circle jerk. So who's gay? :-)
To: OpusatFR
They were called dandies right up til the 60's and there were plain dandies and dandies that were light in the loafers.
42
posted on
08/28/2003 6:01:51 PM PDT
by
mlmr
(Today is the first day of the rest of the pie.)
To: snowstorm12
Is that hair on his body real??
43
posted on
08/28/2003 6:06:17 PM PDT
by
mlmr
(Today is the first day of the rest of the pie.)
To: Roscoe Karns
Not anymore I wouldnt
44
posted on
08/28/2003 6:07:05 PM PDT
by
mlmr
(Today is the first day of the rest of the pie.)
To: presidio9
Heterosodomites.
Even if they sleep with women, they have the classic attitudes of sodomites toward superficial cultural distinctions and beauty and taste. Well, such fads come and go. Once this bunch goes far enough, the females instinctively avoid them and they can't breed. Just like real sodomites.
For all the complaining on these issues, females don't want men who actually cry. They want men who act like they could cry but never do. And serious women don't want to compete with their mate on interior decoration and fashion. They want a male who isn't too dainty to take out the garbage when told to. Or better, can be trained to do it like a dog.
I read a few recent articles on the big push for the feminizing of the once-rugged Aussie male. Well, once they taken your guns, you might as well obsess over the latest fashion tips and 'dos.
To: Roscoe Karns
Two can play that silly game. I bet most women would take this man over your metrosexuals.
Bad choice. I'm afraid that Connery was the original metrosexual, the prototype. Because he was quite masculine, he got away with even more of it than his successors as Bond could.
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
I'll stick with calling them faggots.I'm with you Gill. May as well call them queers too.
47
posted on
08/28/2003 7:03:37 PM PDT
by
upchuck
(I will pay big bucks for a tag line good enough to make the next "Taglinus FreeRepublicus" post.)
To: George W. Bush
I'm afraid that Connery was the original metrosexual, the prototype. Because he was quite masculine, he got away with even more of it than his successors as Bond could. I was waiting for someone to point that out! OF COURSE Connery was a dandy ( I hate stupid liberal media neologisms like "metrosexual", I'm not going to use the lingo of those morons). But the bigger point you made was, what does being a dandy have to do with being effeminate or gay? NOTHING. Connery is a dandy and a man's man too. Quite an ideal worth emulating. Casanova was a dandy. Are the macho men here going to call him gay too??
To: All
49
posted on
08/28/2003 7:11:54 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: IowaHawk
Man, you've been on a roll for the past 24 hours!
To: CanadianLibertarian
I was waiting for someone to point that out! OF COURSE Connery was a dandy
Look at the photo. It was carefully posed and the makeup done in the style associated with female fashion models of the Sixties. In particular, the slightly pouting vacant motionless lips and the tweaked and plucked eyebrows/lashes, the eyes posed widely open to accent the cheekbones and underlying skull shape (observe the lines in the forehead the show the effort in the pose). Well, at any rate, they groomed Connery superbly for the posing. He also modeled the metrosexual by being knowledgable in wines and other matters of taste and fussing over his clothes and tailor. A British metrosexual but still within that group. Connery also modeled some rather daring male fashion/attire for the period. His native charm and masculinity covered it all adequately for movie fare.
Though he might not have gotten away with it in real life in a blue-collar bar in a working-class town, in either Britain or America. But those movies, like many others, weren't about wanting to know or be friends with James Bond. They were about wanting to be James Bond, the sophisticated man about town and spy and ladykiller.
Still, there is a bit of difference between a Hollywood man about town and a flaming metrosexual.
To: George W. Bush
...name could be Anna Rodham Clinton and it would still be allllll goood.Whoa, let's not go overboard.
52
posted on
08/29/2003 6:51:53 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(Run Al Run!!!)
To: George W. Bush
Also it's a languid pose for Sean Connery where he is the object rather than the initiator, the agent of doing.
53
posted on
08/29/2003 7:04:58 AM PDT
by
dennisw
(G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
To: presidio9
What's this "metrosexual" nonsense? We already have perfectly good words for it: "fop" and "dandy".
54
posted on
11/17/2003 8:46:51 AM PST
by
steve-b
To: presidio9
Metrosexual? I don't get it! Does this have something to do with screwing in the metro?
To: egarvue
I beg your pardon. A Preppie and a Dandy are about as far apart as cheese aand chalk. The Dandy dresses up in the latest fashions in order to be seen; we Preppies dress in the same plain, practical clothes our grandfathers wore and prefer to remain anonymous.
56
posted on
11/17/2003 8:51:00 AM PST
by
B-Chan
(Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
To: presidio9
Metros...WEAK!
57
posted on
11/17/2003 8:52:28 AM PST
by
Dan from Michigan
("Today's music ain't got the same soul. I like that old time Rock N Roll" - Bob Seger)
To: presidio9
Metrosexual, first from the right.
To: snowstorm12
Guys who hate "metrosexuals" are a bunch of ugly, envious, washed up, short, old, fat, hairy disgusting unhygienic males who can't goom themselves and are extremely jealous of gorgeous, sexy, well groomed, interesting men so they attack their masculinity or call them gay.
I take it then that you are coming out of the closet ??
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson