To: JohnGalt
A well armed citizenry and a decentralized government, you know traditional conservativism. How would a handgun protect the targets in the WTC? COnservatism espouses limited government. One priority of this government is to protect citizens when they are simply unable to protect themselves, as in the WTC attacks and other terrorist attacks.
It is better to have an army trained to do this than unsuspecting citizens doing this.
59 posted on
08/28/2003 8:08:50 AM PDT by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
Debating the merits of foreign interventions is fine and fair, but you are closing your eyes to the article and the posters who are content to ostensibly have American soldiers take terrorist bullets rather than themselves.
What say you to the poster who said at least they can shoot back?
The responsibility of preservation of self and family is a moral responsibility abdicated by many apparently.
More Todd Beamers
Fewer Ivy Leaguers
70 posted on
08/28/2003 8:14:15 AM PDT by
JohnGalt
(Vichycons-- Supporting Endless War Abroad; Appeasing the Welfare State at Home, Since 2001)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson