[JohnGalt]

Then why did the author say it was a good thing?


That is all well and good that the author takes no responsibility to protect himself or his family, but its gutless to advocate a policy of putting a man or women in harms way half a world away as a stand in for terrorist targets.

[netmilsmom]

Then why did the author say it was a good thing?


That is all well and good that the author takes no responsibility to protect himself or his family, but its gutless to advocate a policy of putting a man or women in harms way half a world away as a stand in for terrorist targets.


He said it was a good thing because we have put trained professional soldiers against these thugs instead of our moms and dads, sisters and brothers and mostly our children against them.
No death is a good death, soldier or civilian. At least the soldiers have a fighting chance. My five year old does not.

[BigWaveBetty]

That is all well and good that the author takes no responsibility to protect himself or his family,

Since you have the answer to protecting ourselves (individually) against terrorist attacks please share it with us all.