HOW can 'the law' listen to an ADULTEROUS husband?
Has anyone informed Gov. Bush, or that judge, that if the husband succeeds in killing off Teri, that the action will be NO DIFFERENT than what Kevorkian was jailed for. It would be NO DIFFERENT than the various healthcare workers we've read about, who were caught and found GUILTY of killing off patients that were in 'bad condition'. It's going to set a horrific precedent for anyone alive.
If Teri did NOT have the 'I-don't-want-to-live-as-a-vegetable-in-case' put IN WRITING then how can 'the law' proceed with killing her?
The husband didn't come up with the 'Terri didn't want to live as a vegetable' claim till after the large malpractice suits. He sealed her medical records, hiding the x-rays that seem to show abuse till recently, and because it's been over ten years the judge refused to allow it as evidence.
It's just totally sickening. I really really wish I had the means to wisk Terri to safety.