[churchillbuff]

Sigh* What a pathetic attempt at slander. I haven't changed since 77' either. . .

Funny how Freepers looked at old "hijinks" with less generosity when it was Clinton's background we were talking about. Being the establishment Republican candidate means you can have skeletons of the same kind that got Clinton pummeled on this board. (I was one of the pummelers - - and I'm not sure why I should adopt a double standard now simply because Arnold has been endorsed by PEte Wilson)

[Tempest]

Hardly so the only Arnold was young and single at the time.

That's hardly comparable to Clinton's antic as a married man a nd father that was currently involved in politics at the time and FORCING his advances on women or abusing his powers while in office on taxpayers dollars.

[TankerKC]

Funny how Freepers looked at old "hijinks" with less generosity when it was Clinton's background we were talking about.

Except that Clinton's behavior continued and he smeared anyone who tried to expose it.

Of course, you do have a point, if folks already like Arnold, they are less likely to be swayed by something like this. I assume that you are not a fan of Arnold's candidacy and/or you have another person you'd rather see in office. You probably won't be swayed either.

I'm waiting for the dirt on Gary Coleman, so I can ignore it and defend him!