To: Porterville
Arnold is rough around the edges, but that might just be what we need in SacrementoI understand your frustration at the Employee Unions, the Marxist Legislatureect and that is fine. But this is the WRONG battlefield to be fighting THEM on. That article is quite disgustingly vulger, and I'm a young guy so it takes alot to be offended these days. More importantly, trying to blow it off compromises Conservatives. You want him in there, fine, but don't rationalize this, and if some Demo brings it up, give ground because you have to. Its something he can do some mea culpas and be forgiven about and it forgotten, but DON'T MAKE EXCUSES FOR IT BEFORE THEN BECAUSE YOU WANT HIM IN POWER. That is very bad, from a precident standpoint, as well as an intellectually consistent one.
Lets just pretend this never was published, but if its brought up, never say its ok to do what he did with that girl.
291 posted on
08/27/2003 5:44:16 PM PDT by
PeoplesRep_of_LA
(Stop Dividing the Republican base; vote McClintock on October 7, 2003!)
To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
It wasn't moral and he should have been aware of how stupid it is to brag about such an immoral action. But, if an outsider wants to go to Sacremento and toss out the unions, well I'd even vote Liberatarian.
304 posted on
08/27/2003 5:47:35 PM PDT by
Porterville
(Et tu liberal?? Et tu???)
To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
but if its brought up, never say its ok to do what he did with that girl. Thank you.
306 posted on
08/27/2003 5:48:29 PM PDT by
Canticle_of_Deborah
(Proud card carrying member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy since 1984)
To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
never say its ok to do what he did with that girl. If it was consensual, and it was, then it is okay, regardless of your values.
319 posted on
08/27/2003 5:55:08 PM PDT by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson