Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OUI, OUI: ARNOLD PUMPS UP ORGIES AND DOPE IN '77 SHOCK INTERVIEW
Drudge Report ^

Posted on 08/27/2003 3:59:45 PM PDT by journey7873

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 681-685 next last
To: section9
I, apparently, was mistaken. We are in agreement. I'm sorry, this is making me crazy, this friggin' internestine warfare, aaarrrrggghhhhhh
361 posted on 08/27/2003 6:16:31 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
How ridiculous of freepers to say such things as if we are all a bunch of sexed up pot heads with no morals. I for one am sick to death of this kind of thing on FreeRepublic.

Thank you. There are lots of decent people in California. The stereotypes out of staters project on us as a whole are ridiculous.

362 posted on 08/27/2003 6:16:36 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Proud card carrying member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy since 1984)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Unforetunately, the bandwagon for McC will not grow. The needed electorate will not turn out for him.

Sabertooth says...Just understand how much you strengthen the Democrats by saying so.

The truth will do that? The Republican party must really be going down the shitter. I think not.

363 posted on 08/27/2003 6:18:08 PM PDT by Moosefart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Who outside of Orange county has even heard of McClintock?

The Dems are doing it again in California, dividing us and then conquering. In my opinion, Arnold is the ONLY electable candidate with an "(R)" in front of their name.

He may not be another Ronald Reagan, but he sure as hell beats the altenative.
--
Z-28
San Diego, CA
364 posted on 08/27/2003 6:18:37 PM PDT by Z-28
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: ventana
This is just getting silly now.
365 posted on 08/27/2003 6:19:33 PM PDT by Hildy (Vote McClintock and get Bustamante.... hope you're happy....amigos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
BUMP
366 posted on 08/27/2003 6:20:27 PM PDT by GrandMoM ("What is impossible with men is possible with GOD -Luke 18:27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Oh, I did not read that part. Yup, I guess that will help him also!
367 posted on 08/27/2003 6:21:16 PM PDT by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth

Calling McClintock unelectable is simply stating a truth. He has lost both statewide races he has been in.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

368 posted on 08/27/2003 6:21:39 PM PDT by section9 (To read my blog, click on the Major!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: gdani
He was also a single man. If it is OK for a married president in the oval office to have oral sex with an employee, then this is a big, so what?
369 posted on 08/27/2003 6:21:40 PM PDT by w1andsodidwe (recycling is a waste of time for hardworking taxpayers, hire the homeless to sort garbage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Porterville
"So he was a kid in the 70's"

29 years old is a kid? That's how old he was in 1979!
370 posted on 08/27/2003 6:22:12 PM PDT by poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Moosefart

Read my comments on this thread, and then take the post to which you responded in that context.

371 posted on 08/27/2003 6:23:20 PM PDT by Sabertooth (If Proposition #187 were on the ballot this October, would Arnold or Tom vote for it again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Just understand how much you strengthen the Democrats by saying so

I dunno, I'm extremely frustrated. No one I talk to in lalaland is excited about McC, and the 'dumbed down' electorate (friends of my kids, products of public edimakazion), and others are excited about AS. How does preaching that perceived reality hurt McC? It is intended as my view of the truth. I agree with D1, if McC numbers turn around, I will vote for him! That would take a seachange, however. These things happen, they always happen, the thing unforeseen. Again, in my perception, the AS supporters, for the most part, are leaving McC alone and attacking the rabid McC supporters instead. The continued heat and anger is making lots of folks come unglued. I'd like to see each candidate treated respectfully, but I intend to keep battling crap with dirt and dirt with crap.

372 posted on 08/27/2003 6:25:06 PM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 0311, 68-69)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: section9
Calling McClintock unelectable is simply stating a truth. He has lost both statewide races he has been in.

Calling Ahnold a RINO scumbag is simply stating a truth. He is a liar and has no guiding principles or forward looking vision for this state.

373 posted on 08/27/2003 6:25:25 PM PDT by ambrose (People who condemned Clinton and now support Ahnold are hypocrites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush; ElkGroveDan
Tom McClintocks numbers go down every time he gets on the radio to talk. He is boooring. He is Gore(R), stiff and uncomfortable.

He doesn't have the strength needed to rule a state. He can barely handle two fairly polite reporters, what would he do with screaming opponents?

Regardless of his message, which is good, (and which arnold is using a majority of) he is unwinnable and while it is definately his perogative to stay in the race, I won't be voting for Pero, I mean McClintock this time.

And now that Arnold is espousing a lot of McClintocks Ideas, why do you still oppose him? Because he won't crucify gays?

Do you even live in CA?
374 posted on 08/27/2003 6:26:00 PM PDT by LaraCroft ('Bout time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: section9

Calling McClintock unelectable is simply stating a truth. He has lost both statewide races he has been in.

Those were conventional elections, this isn't; it's a recall and replacement election.

I understand the need to force a conventional analysis here, but I think it's far too early to do so.


375 posted on 08/27/2003 6:27:56 PM PDT by Sabertooth (If Proposition #187 were on the ballot this October, would Arnold or Tom vote for it again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
(ahem), I must have missed that.

Darn.
376 posted on 08/27/2003 6:27:59 PM PDT by LaraCroft ('Bout time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

Comment #377 Removed by Moderator

To: Sabertooth

Oh, I do see your point. How and ever, if AS did drop out, methinks that the California middle ground would move back to Davis and the recall would fail. A pretty good educated hunch, based on how Californians have voted since Clinton won the state in 1992.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

378 posted on 08/27/2003 6:30:01 PM PDT by section9 (To read my blog, click on the Major!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Yeah, and W is unfit to be president because he was a drunk and a partier.
379 posted on 08/27/2003 6:30:04 PM PDT by LaraCroft ('Bout time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Howard_Beal
Disruptor.
380 posted on 08/27/2003 6:31:28 PM PDT by ambrose (People who condemned Clinton and now support Ahnold are hypocrites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 681-685 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson