Not as easy as I thought he'd be.
I did notice that he failed to ask Arnold about Gay Adoption. A little slip-up (purposeful) on the part of Hannity, IMHO.
No...couldn't be... :-)
Hannity is the prototypical checked-pants Republican. He's in favor of Good Things and is against Bad Stuff.
That's right. In the past, AS has made it clear that he favors turning children over to the custody of homosexual "adoptive parents." Anybody with any decency would be shocked by that view. It was a major, major oversight for Hannity to fail to question AS on that.
Arnold's support of homo "domestic partnerships" means he has no objection to conferring benefits on homosexuals that are paid for by the taxpayers, just as they are for legitimate marriages. That's hugely objectionable to me and Hannity failed to ask him about that too.
Hannity also failed to ask AS directly if he recognizes the individual RKBA and would not sign any bills abrogating that right, eg. prohibitive taxes on ammo and other oppressive fees and taxes on firearms, further bans on particular weapons, registration and other onerous transgressions, etc. His support of the "assault weapon" ban is ominous.
Further, Hannity failed to follow up on AS's statement that he would pass the buck to the schools on the prayer issue. Who doesn't know that the public schools are owned and operated exclusively by liberals and the teacher's unions -- who are well-known for their hostility to prayer (unless it's wiccan or muslim)?
Other important things Hannity failed to cover include the bad energy contracts and whether he would rescind them, the down-sizing and streamlining of wasteful state bureaucracy, the reform of workman's comp, the water problem, the crippling of business by unduly restrictive and costly state environmental laws and regs.