Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Movers Haul Away Ten Commandments in Montgomery
FOXNews.com ^ | Wednesday, August 27, 2003

Posted on 08/27/2003 8:59:09 AM PDT by NWO Slave

MONTGOMERY, Ala. — A chorus of demonstrators joined an irate man in screaming "Put it back!" Wednesday morning after a monument of the Ten Commandments was wheeled away from the rotunda of the Alabama Judicial Building.

"Get your hands off our God, God haters!" yelled the wildly gesturing, red-faced man who initiated the chanting.

Workers used a dolly to move the 5,280-pound granite marker from the rotunda to another, undisclosed place in the courthouse building.

Meanwhile, a Wednesday afternoon hearing to consider a lawsuit to keep the monument in the rotunda was canceled.

The lawsuit, filed Monday in federal court in Mobile on behalf of a Christian radio talk show host and a pastor, says forced removal of the monument would violate the constitutional guarantee of freedom of religion.

Christian Defense Coalition Director Patrick Mahoney told the crowd of demonstrators that he wasn't told where the monument had been taken.

Because of its size and weight, the marker was presumably moved to another location on the ground floor of the building.

Mahoney said the monument would not be covered, and that he would be allowed inside to see it once it was moved. Mahoney said he was informed of the plans by building manager Graham George.

Mahoney didn't know whether the monument's new location would be accessible to the public.

The federal court had said the monument could be in a private place in the building but not in the highly visible spot in the rotunda directly across from the building's entrance.

Protest organizers asked the crowd outside not to rush the building or do anything else except pray. Some people seemed to be listening, with dozens kneeling, bowing or lying face-down in prayer in front of the judicial building and on the steps before and after the monument's removal.

The marker was wheeled away in a matter of minutes.

A federal judge in Montgomery ruled last year that the monument, which Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore (search) installed two years ago, violates the Constitution's ban on government promotion of religion and ordered its removal by Aug. 20. The U.S. Supreme Court last week declined to hear Moore's appeal.

But Moore refused to comply. Eight associate justices voted Aug. 21 to remove the monument, and Moore was suspended the next day.

Attorney General Bill Pryor, defending the associate justices, filed a motion Tuesday afternoon to dismiss the latest lawsuit, saying the Mobile court lacks jurisdiction and the complaint lacks merit.

About 150 monument supporters marched on Pryor's office Tuesday, demanding he resign for supporting the associate justices' decision. Seven representatives were allowed inside to meet with Pryor's chief deputy for about 20 minutes. The rest remained outside, chanting, "Resign now! Resign now!"

Gatherings of pro-monument demonstrators outside the judicial building have grown each day in the past week to at times number in the hundreds.

People seeking removal of the monument from its public site had said they were grateful that it was finally being moved, a week after the deadline set by a federal judge.

"This is a tremendous victory for the rule of law and respect for religious diversity," the Rev. Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said before the monument was rolled out of the rotunda. "Perhaps Roy Moore will soon leave the bench and move into the pulpit, which he seems better suited for."

Lynne's organization was among groups suing to remove Moore's monument, which he installed without telling the other eight Supreme Court justices.

Demonstrators promised to keep up their protests of the removal.

"If it takes 75 years to reclaim this land for righteousness, God find us and our children and our children's children ready," said the Rev. Rob Schenck, president of the national clergy council.

Affirmative Action Judge Opposing Judge Roy Moore


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: noothergods; purge; shallyouhave; tencommandments
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 621-631 next last
To: MEGoody
Actually, Barry Lynn is executive director of Satanists for the Abolition of All Things Christian

This is ridiculous. The guy is an ordained minister.

141 posted on 08/27/2003 10:42:05 AM PDT by huck von finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: T'wit
Really? I didn't realize they had the ORIGINAL 10 Commandment stones on display in Montgomery...

Seriously, If these are the Originals, that changes the whole thing...

/sarcasm
142 posted on 08/27/2003 10:42:11 AM PDT by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RoughDobermann
"You made the assertion. Please back it up with facts."

Oh, there have been a few, scattered cases where some overzealous teacher or school administrator has done some stupid thing like taking a Bible away from a student. These situations get corrected quickly, as they should.

But, they live on in the annals of those who want to believe that this is where we're heading. Never mind the court decisions that re-affirm kids rights to take Bibles to school, etc.

But, whenever the discussion comes up, out these stories come, without the explanation of how they concluded.
143 posted on 08/27/2003 10:44:18 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

Comment #144 Removed by Moderator

To: PleaseNoMore
Because of our denomination ( actually we are non denominational )

?????? we have been advised to increase our limits of liability "just in case the pastor preaches something in the pulpit that another may find offensive."

What church is this? What would be offensive?

145 posted on 08/27/2003 10:46:47 AM PDT by huck von finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: unixfox; MineralMan; carenot


146 posted on 08/27/2003 10:47:07 AM PDT by MatthewViti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Nope. I don't try to prove anything at all. I simply disbelieve.

I didn't say you were "atheism" did I?

Nevertheless, why are atheists not content to keep their convictions to themselves as they so often council theists to do? Because of the inherent assumption of superiority coming from the conviction that theists are irrational and they themselves are rational.

Explain it any way you like, but atheists credit themselves as intellectually superior, though the educated ones will admit when pressed, they have no more positive basis for their convictions than the theist.

147 posted on 08/27/2003 10:47:11 AM PDT by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Oh, there have been a few, scattered cases where some overzealous teacher or school administrator has done some stupid thing like taking a Bible away from a student. These situations get corrected quickly, as they should.

Good. I was hoping for some context too. For example, was the child reading the Bible while the teacher was on another subject? If so, the teacher would have been correct in removing the bible from the child. Just as the teacher would be correct if the child was reading a comic book during math lessons...

148 posted on 08/27/2003 10:47:29 AM PDT by RoughDobermann (Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
If you're going to talk about scriptures, you might want to get familiar with your own.

The difference being is that we now have the NEW Testament which means we are no longer under the same penalty for sin as delineated in the Old Testament.

149 posted on 08/27/2003 10:47:46 AM PDT by nfldgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

Comment #150 Removed by Moderator

To: huck von finn
It must have been a shock to have discovered a monument to the ten commandments had been smuggled in under everyone's noses!
151 posted on 08/27/2003 10:47:59 AM PDT by Liberal Classic (Quemadmodum gladius neminem occidit, occidentis telum est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: huck von finn
Indeed.....they always mention it to (though I don't think out of political reasons...most journalistic writing stylebooks call for always highlighting when someone is a member of the clergy).

That said, he is pastor of a liberal church IIRC, which would figure.
152 posted on 08/27/2003 10:47:59 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
And lying is really important to make it in today's society.

Bill and Hillary think so. They ain't too partiklar 'bout the rest, either.

153 posted on 08/27/2003 10:48:37 AM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
If he meant that literally (I actually think he was referring to a general belief that God is being removed from the public square everywhere), he is an idolator. Even if he isn't, he needs to watch his statements. One could easily interpret that as a statement referring to the Ten Commandments as god.

I agree. I didn't put it in the last post, but one of the two or three men trying to keep this plaid shirt guy back from the steps of the Courthouse told him something like, "The Ten Commandments aren't God." I can't be sure if that's an exact quote, but it's close. I also doubt if the plaid shirt guy heard him--he was that out of control. If they hadn't stopped him, I'm sure he would've charged the door or even gone through the plate glass window. I do remember hearing him continuing to yell and scream while Mahoney and others tried to speak.

154 posted on 08/27/2003 10:48:51 AM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Woahhs
why are atheists not content to keep their convictions to themselves

Conversely, why are religious folk not content to keep their convictions to themselves?

155 posted on 08/27/2003 10:49:56 AM PDT by RoughDobermann (Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: grayout
Good Point grayout...

That's probably because the people that should be busy posting them in Churches, are too busy trying to get them posted in Bus Stations, Airports, Court Houses, etc...

Interesting...
156 posted on 08/27/2003 10:50:01 AM PDT by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: kafir
Your # 42 is well stated. I agree.
157 posted on 08/27/2003 10:50:11 AM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: huck von finn
It is a small church in southern NC. Yes, it was offensive especially after the agent pointed out that the threat of a libel or slander suit was very real in today's society.
158 posted on 08/27/2003 10:51:13 AM PDT by PleaseNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: PleaseNoMore
"In Houston a woman has instigated a lawsuit to remove the bible from one of the courthouses there. So in a sense, yes they are coming after the bible.

I just had a meeting with our church's insurance agent. Because of our denomination ( actually we are non denominational )we have been advised to increase our limits of liability "just in case the pastor preaches something in the pulpit that another may find offensive."

"

That woman will, no doubt, lose. Now, are you sure she's trying to remove the Bibles or is she trying to stop the practice of trying to force everyone to swear oaths on the Bible. If it's the latter, then she'll win. I never swear oaths on the Bible. I always simply affirm my oath, as laid out in our wonderful Consitution.

As for the second case, the insurance agent is probably wise in his recommendation. Your preacher, in a fit of zeal might just slander someone in one of his sermons. I've heard it happen in churches, where a preacher called a specific person a "whore." That's actionable, whether it's done by a preacher or by anyone else. Churches should carry good insurance policies against lawsuits, don't you think?
159 posted on 08/27/2003 10:51:38 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Sneaking? How does one sneak such a thing into a building?

Well, apparently Moore erected the thing in the courthouse in the middle of the night--for some reason. But my point is that because of the influence of the Separatists in this country, we have the laws that keep religion and government apart. That's how it should be, for the good of government, but more importantly, for the benefit of faith and religion. Moore may have thought that erecting that monument in the courthouse was the right thing to do, but he was very misguided.

160 posted on 08/27/2003 10:51:58 AM PDT by huck von finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 621-631 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson