Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tpaine
No, tpaine, it is your understanding of constitutional history that is flawed (not suprisingly).

Once again: the federal Bill of Rights was designed as a limitation on federal power only. Religion was a matter left entirely and exclusively to the states.

Because religion was left entirely to the states, each state adopted its own laws and constitutional provisions concering religion. Here's what Virginia adopted:

Section 16. Free exercise of religion; no establishment of religion.

"That religion or the duty which we owe to our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence; and, therefore, all men are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that it is the mutual duty of all to practice Christian forbearance, love, and charity towards each other. No man shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever, nor shall be enforced, restrained, molested, or burthened in his body or goods, nor shall otherwise suffer on account of his religious opinions or belief; but all men shall be free to profess and by argument to maintain their opinions in matters of religion, and the same shall in nowise diminish, enlarge, or affect their civil capacities. And the General Assembly shall not prescribe any religious test whatever, or confer any peculiar privileges or advantages on any sect or denomination, or pass any law requiring or authorizing any religious society, or the people of any district within this Commonwealth, to levy on themselves or others, any tax for the erection or repair of any house of public worship, or for the support of any church or ministry; but it shall be left free to every person to select his religious instructor, and to make for his support such private contract as he shall please."

Use your brain, tpaine. If the federal Bill of Rights was intended to bind the states as well as the federal government, why did the people of Virginia adopt their own separate, detailed and wordy free exercise and establishment clauses in that state's constitution? Just for grins? Because they had an extra pot of ink and a couple of quills and wanted to doodle?

90 posted on 08/27/2003 8:18:18 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Kevin Curry
Use your brain, tpaine. If the federal Bill of Rights was intended to bind the states as well as the federal government, why did the people of Virginia adopt their own separate, detailed and wordy free exercise and establishment clauses in that state's constitution? Just for grins? Because they had an extra pot of ink and a couple of quills and wanted to doodle?
90 -kev-


The Constitution of Virginia
June 29, 1776
Bill of Rights; June 12, 1776


U.S. BOR's ratified 1791.
97 posted on 08/27/2003 8:48:29 PM PDT by tpaine ( I'm trying to be Mr Nice Guy, but politics keep getting in me way. ArnieRino for Governator!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: Kevin Curry
Yappy doesn't like quotes. Unless they're fraudulent.
102 posted on 08/28/2003 12:02:27 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson