Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E Rocc
>> What those of us who believe in separation are saying is that since public schools subsist on tax dollars and can in many cases compel attendance, they must be considered an agency of the government and therefore must not show religious preference.

I doubt I will ever understand liberterians. But I do know that removal of prayer in public school, and removal of all referenced to God in public places, was never the intent of the Founding Fathers, nor the intent of those who ratified the 14th Amendment. From what you said, it appears liberterians support usurpation. I do not.



114 posted on 08/28/2003 5:37:07 AM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies ]


To: PhilipFreneau
I doubt I will ever understand liberterians. But I do know that removal of prayer in public school, and removal of all referenced to God in public places, was never the intent of the Founding Fathers, nor the intent of those who ratified the 14th Amendment.
You are reviving a red herring embraced by the anti-Separationists. No one is saying that all references to God must be removed from all "public places". Only that governmental entities may not show religious preference, giving one sect or group of sects privileges not granted to all.

-Eric

116 posted on 08/28/2003 5:43:11 AM PDT by E Rocc (Separation between church and state: It's not just the law, it's a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson