[arete]

Isn't that one of those liberal "for the children" arguments? Whatever works for you I guess.

Richard W.

[Destructor]

"Isn't that one of those liberal "for the children" arguments? Whatever works for you I guess."

"Richard W."

As opposed to one of those liberal-tarian "Bush is always wrong" arguments?

[Peach]

Have you ever read a book about Iraq? There isn't a positive one on the market but perhaps you'd like to write one - not that there is a market for that kind of revisionist history.

I've read every book I can lay my hands on about Iraq and can recommend The Threatening Storm. Not that I think you'll read it - you have an agenda you're too busy pushing.

[Mr. K]

yes, except THIS is an ACTUAL 'for the children' argument involving actual real children being torured and killed. Is that OK with you if Saddam kept doing that?

This is opposed to the fictional 'for the children' argument liberals make for pretty much any idiotig new government program. ("This new gun control law is 'for the children'" - see any difference? )