So now the argument evolves yet again. Slippery sucker, aren't you? Yeah, it's evident by all those staged arguments (Phil Hendrie notwithstanding) that only conservatives listen to talk radio.
He's still "Tom who?" to the rest of the world.
Which is fine, since in theory it's only Californians who will be voting (unless Davis can ram that drivers license bill through quickly enough). And I really can't help it that you hang out with people so uninformed that they have yet to hear the name of one of the main Republican candidates in this election. Clearly you can't be depended on to inform them, in any case. Sounds like your friends are a big part of the reason we have Gray Davis in office in the first place.
Yup, you evolved it. If you demand that I lay out every single potential argument in my initial post, then I hereby demand that you take an airborne fornication at a rolling doughnut.
Slippery sucker, aren't you? Yeah, it's evident by all those staged arguments (Phil Hendrie notwithstanding) that only conservatives listen to talk radio.
The ones arguing with the hosts won't go for McClintock. The mushy middle doesn't listen to talk radio. So he gets the votes that he'd probably get anyway. In this case, he actually wasted money.
Which is fine, since in theory it's only Californians who will be voting (unless Davis can ram that drivers license bill through quickly enough).
Ha ha.
OK, you overly pedantic a**hole, he's still "Tom who?" to the rest of the California electorate.
And I really can't help it that you hang out with people so uninformed that they have yet to hear the name of one of the main Republican candidates in this election.
Yeah, believe it or not, I hang out with people who generally get interested in politics in the last two weeks of the election, based on what they saw on TV during the previous three weeks.