To: Physicist
Was I ever right about Judicial Watch. (Told you so! Told you so!)
25 posted on
08/26/2003 5:31:49 PM PDT by
Glenn
(What were you thinking, Al?)
To: Glenn
"When plaintiffs terminated Judicial Watch, they [also] terminated Judicial Watch's ability to apply its substantial skill and expertise to achieve this outcome," they wrote.*Snort*
30 posted on
08/26/2003 5:37:27 PM PDT by
Howlin
To: Glenn; Jim Robinson; Physicist; Alamo-Girl
I think this confirms what many of us have been thinking about Judicial Watch and Larry Klayman as they have disappointed us over the years since their early suits against the Clintons that brought them notoriety.
Given this poor treatment of fellow FReepers, is it appropriate to drop FR's front page link to Judicial Watch?
I remember a time when the "Bloodied but not Beaten" picture of Don Adams held a promanent position on the front page of FR. I understand the legal sensitivities involved, but wouldn't it be appropriate for a FReeper to host an archieved version of the original Don Adams page and have it linked on the FR front page again?
46 posted on
08/26/2003 6:56:52 PM PDT by
anymouse
To: Glenn
I can't believe someone would actually trust/hire them.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson