[Miss Marple]

You know, I will bet if we search long and hard, we can find some even more audacious examples of his lying.

After today's Brit Hume show, I am not a bit afraid of this guy. He does look like a Hollywood general, but I think he is a dim bulb. And I bet there is some really inteesting stuff in both his military records and his background (wasn't he at Oxford?).

[Peach]

Prior to today's show, I thought Clark would be the only candidate that could end the Bush presidency. Clark appears on the surface to have the prerequisites: articulate, good looks, national security background, etc. The voting public doesn't look beyond the surface stuff typically.

After today's thread that Clark believes the White House was behind his being fired from CNN, I no longer believe he is a threat. Anyone who believes that CNN would do the White House's bidding is too blindly stupid to qualify for dog catcher.

Then after the roundtable discussion and how Clark confused who actually called him on 9/11, I've decided I'd like him to run, because he CANNOT win. These lies are too big and with the excellent quotes provided by quick Freepers, he just cannot get around the fact that he stated publicly and often that the White House tried to pressure him, when in actuality it was a think tank.

[Grampa Dave]

Yep, Clark is another Arkrazy boy like Bubba Clintoon, who went to Oxford and came out hating America.