I can't even believe you would try to argue that rampant nuclear proliferation would make our country, or the world, a safer place. Talk about illogical.
The spooks are probably working out a short term solution to proliferation. It's not a pretty solution but it'll prolly do the trick. Iran might meet with an unfortunate "accident" and a great many people might sicken and die from the resultant radiation poisoning. It'll serve to rally the world against nuclear proliferation and it'll buy some time. Iran can't be allowed to go nuclear. Ditto Brazil. Ditto Libya. Ditto ditto ditto.
I can't even believe you would try to argue that rampant nuclear proliferation would make our country, or the world, a safer place. Talk about illogical. What the hell are you even talking about?!
Can you show me where I advocated "rampant nuclear proliferation"?
No, you can't. Because you made that up when you couldn't address my actual point.
You favor our unilateral disarmament in a world where a dozen or more nations have nuclear weapons. That's an insane position, and you know it. That's why you feel obligated to make up other people's positions that are as utterly insipid as your own.