Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stuartcr
The SCOTUS has the final word on interpretation of the constitution, however, they refused to hear this case.
15 posted on 08/26/2003 10:01:51 AM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: MEGoody
When the Supreme Court is in disagreement with itself, does that mean then, that there really is no valid interpretation of the Constitution?
22 posted on 08/26/2003 10:12:51 AM PDT by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: MEGoody
The SCOTUS has the final word on interpretation of the constitution, however, they refused to hear this case.

The case has not come before them. They simply refused to issue a 'stay' of the decision of the lower court.

28 posted on 08/26/2003 10:45:27 AM PDT by Looking for Diogenes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: MEGoody
Only because they gave themselves that right. Jefferson called judicial review nothing short of "tyranny."
46 posted on 08/26/2003 11:43:04 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson