Replies

dishonest "hypothetical"

Hypothetical? That's an actual article.

Buy yourself a dictionary.

hypotheticals:
Arnold is NOT yet governor, so you don't KNOW what he will or won't sign. You are presuming to know what he will and will not sign. Maybe if he got a call from McC in the state senate, and Bush about vetoing it AFTER he was elected... he would do just that. Maybe not.
YOU cannot possibly KNOW.

It is patently dishonest to imply that you do.
Furthermore that law has not been signed yet... so it's not even a law... once again, NOT a real situation... your twin hypotheticals, "if it passes" and "he will sign it." Neither established.

I will buy a new dictionary, if you stop using the same old "straw man" arguments based on unknowable hypotheticals as your only debate and discussion approaches.