Posted on 08/26/2003 8:15:41 AM PDT by ALOHA RONNIE
What would he change in California abortion laws? Are anti-Schwarzenegger people advocating that he can make them more liberal? I'd like them to be specific. The argument is a red herring.
I still stand by my basic premise that for any resolution to abortion, it's going to be resolved nationally and not state by state.
That's true.
btw, thanks for the head's up. Roscoe's MO seems to be about deception (a typically leftist MO) and not about legitimate debate. I think I'll ignore him from here on out.
Well he can kiss my @ss the gun grabbing, baby killing, ..........
That quote is NOT referring to banning all abortion. No one was talking about banning all abortion. Abortion restrictions save lives. It's really - very - simple - for - people - who - can - read. Doughty said "Schwarzenegger cannot affect abortion policy" -- thinks it's only a federal issue or something -- which is just completely false, I called him on it repeatedly and on his harassment of the pro-lifer, and he has had no answer, other than to start talking about banning all abortion again. But he's even maybe given up on that argument now, as his federal-only crap has been refuted repeatedly on this thread alone.
BTW, I've never attacked Arnold. I've said he's a liberal, which he is, especially on social issues. I hope he's a fiscal conservative; he says he is, but has no record of public policy decisions (other than the education spending plan). I hope he'd be a positive for the GOP, though the history of 'moderate' governors suggests otherwise. I think there's a good chance Cali will end up with him, so I'm prepared to make the best of it, but I also think Tom McClintock can win -- we'll see if he can gain ground leading up to the election.
To be fair, Rudy has been endorsing, raising money for, campaigning for, every Republican under the sun across the country of all ideologies for the past year and a half. I don't think he's gotten involved in primaries too much, but this election is a different story anyway.
You'll just have to pardon me for realizing I have bigger fish to fry. My choice is between a man at 11% and another at 45%. One of these two men must win against Bustamante.
If Trent Lott was running against the Devil and Bill Clinton were in the race, I'd vote for Bill Clinton if Trent Lott was at 11% and Bill was at 45%.
We've discussed this issue until it's been beaten to death.
Davis Using Abortion as 'Showcase Issue' to Attract Moderates, Los Angeles Times Reports
As abortion plagues Simon, Davis slides around another touchy issue
On Fox News's "O'Reilly Factor," on Aug. 16, 2000, Schwarzenegger described himself as "extremely liberal" on social issues, and said: "I'm for choice. The women should have the choice. The women should decide what they want to do with their bodies. I'm all for that."
On Fox News's "O'Reilly Factor," on Aug. 16, 2000, Schwarzenegger described himself as "extremely liberal" on social issues, and said: "I'm for choice. The women should have the choice. The women should decide what they want to do with their bodies. I'm all for that."
But today, for political advantage, he claims his "extremely liberal" support for abortion doesn't include abortions committed during the actual birth.
How proud you must be.
The only reason I am posting this, is because I do not want fellow FR's to think that I do. Get a life!!
Bump!
;-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.