Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dogbyte12
Our house cost $23k. The same house 27 years later costs $340k.

Only on FR is a 1,478% increase in the value of your home a bad thing.

90 posted on 08/25/2003 4:51:42 PM PDT by Texas_Dawg (Proudly posting without the </sarcasm> tag for at least a few months.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Texas_Dawg
Sigh. pointless. I give up. Go back to mocking and calling everybody a racist with your lawyer friend OPH.

If you really believe that having entry level houses valued at $340k is a good thing for society, I see where the issue is. You say, great on the person who owns it now. Screw young couples. Just because a young couple used to be able to buy a house in California easily before, it's just too bad they can't now.

That is what you believe. Fine. I differ. I think the inner cities, wandering fathers, divorce, decay in society are a result of your attitude. After all, one can afford that house by selling drugs. That money is still green isn't it?

94 posted on 08/25/2003 4:57:59 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: Texas_Dawg
Given the replacement cost, the "profit" is meaningless. It can only be realized if you move to a much less desirable location.

You will always need a place to live, so one house has to be replaced with another.
95 posted on 08/25/2003 4:58:00 PM PDT by Tokhtamish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson