Replies

Sacrasm is a resort used when one is losing a debate, its mud slinging, trying to change the subject. Again, I would love to hear a intelligent, reasonable defense of todays trade polices, but I have yet to hear a single one.

Also, Neo-Cons seme to have no problem with other countries using intervention to keep the dollar inflated, they see few problems with the FED trying to minipulate the bond market down wards, or bailing out banks. A true Libertarian would have none of that. It seems that neo-conservativbes are just as pro big govrenment as liberals are, the only difference is the set of people that get the govrenmnet money.

"I would love to hear a intelligent, reasonable defense of todays trade polices, but I have yet to hear a single one."

What is the maxim about assuming?

Who Said I support this lunacy that government is foisting on business?

Most of the ideas(?) on this thread relate to a more-of-the same attitude. My favorite plan presented by your side was to make a law in regards to how much the CEOs of these corporations can make. Punishing them if they dare to make more money than the workers deemed necessary.

That plan is straight from Atlas Shrugged and it would cause a stampede of Blue Chip companies straight to mainland China.

Want to stop the madness, it is really very simple> Get rid of this madness that business has to deal with IN THE USA.

Until that happens more and more companies are going to run from the USA as fast as their little Capitalist hearts can carry them.

And I say more power to them. Shrug Baby Shrug, and send the socialist parasites into oblivion!

Well if you do a search on the Uraguay(sp?) Round tariff ageements you will see a frank admission by those who set upthe curremnt tarde structure taht is a wealth transfer program from America and to a lesser extent other wealthy nations to poor nations. I had a link a couple days ago but today is not a good day for links for me.