To: rmgatto
Wow, personal insults and not a whit about the facts. Found any WMDs yet have they? Besides the bag of beans and a 12 year old centrifuge?
70 posted on
08/25/2003 12:59:51 PM PDT by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: billbears
Found any WMDs yet have they?I relatively sure that Saddam Hussein existed, but they haven't found him yet either. Does that mean he doesn't exist?
71 posted on
08/25/2003 1:01:27 PM PDT by
RoughDobermann
(Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.)
To: billbears
After listening to David Kaye recently, even most Democrats have stopped the "where are the WMD" whine. I have read that the Kaye report will be quite astounding. We will all be informed soon I hope.
Is World Tribune reputable? I always thought that World Tribune was on par with DEBKA
To: billbears
In addition to not finding any WMDs, they fail to explain why the WMDs weren't launched within 45 minutes as Blair had claimed they could be, and why Iraq didn't use them on us in all the years that they were supposed to have had them.
I've also never seen or heard a precise definition of the term "weapons of mass destruction". It's a nice vague scary term that means whatever they want it to mean.
85 posted on
08/25/2003 1:06:59 PM PDT by
alpowolf
To: billbears
Fact is, your arguments leave out many salient elements that have been described many times here and elsewhere. Sorry to see that you are a democrat at heart as your ancestors most likely were in party affiliation.
156 posted on
08/25/2003 2:12:14 PM PDT by
rmgatto
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson