Skip to comments.
Report: U.S suspects Iraqi WMD in Lebanon's Bekaa Valley
Drudge via World Tribune ^
| Monday, August 25, 2003
Posted on 08/25/2003 12:12:28 PM PDT by RoughDobermann
U.S. intelligence suspects Iraq's weapons of mass destruction have finally been located.
Unfortunately, getting to them will be nearly impossible for the United States and its allies, because the containers with the strategic materials are not in Iraq.
Instead they are located in Lebanon's heavily-fortified Bekaa Valley, swarming with Iranian and Syrian forces, and Hizbullah and ex-Iraqi agents, Geostrategy-Direct.com will report in tomorrow's new weekly edition.
U.S. intelligence first identified a stream of tractor-trailer trucks moving from Iraq to Syria to Lebaon in January 2003. The significance of this sighting did not register on the CIA at the time.
U.S. intelligence sources believe the area contains extended-range Scud-based missiles and parts for chemical and biological warheads.
Mutually-lucrative Iraqi-Syrian arms transactions are nothing new. Firas Tlas, son of Syrian Defense Minister Mustafa Tlas, has been the key to Syria's rogue alliance with Iraq. He and Assad made hundreds of millions of dollars selling weapons, oil and drugs to and from Iraq, according to the May 13, 2003 edition of Geostrategy-Direct.com.
The CIA now believes a multi-million dollar deal between Iraq and Syria provided for the hiding and safekeeping of Saddam's strategic weapons.
Not surprisingly, U.S. inquiries in Beirut and Syria are being met with little substantive response, U.S. officials said.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bekaa; bekaavalley; iraq; israel; lebanon; mohammedanism082003; saddam; syria; wmd; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 241-256 next last
To: billbears; hchutch
I'm quite sure Hussein existed, from the footage, but I don't remember seeing footage of 30,000 munitions or thousands of tons of WMDs either.Funny, those figures are what IRAQ admitted to after Gulf War I.
I accept God by faith, everyone else has to supply evidence
And the IRAQIS did so.
So WTF did they do with it?
81
posted on
08/25/2003 1:05:54 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
To: billbears
buzz off baby. Conservatives should wonder why we have people undermining the last best hope we have.
82
posted on
08/25/2003 1:06:02 PM PDT
by
cajungirl
(no)
Comment #83 Removed by Moderator
To: Republican Red
After listening to David Kaye recently, even most Democrats have stopped the "where are the WMD" whine. I have read that the Kaye report will be quite astounding. We will all be informed soon I hope.And if so I will respectfully withdraw some, but not all, of my criticism of the actions in Iraq.
84
posted on
08/25/2003 1:06:12 PM PDT
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: billbears
In addition to not finding any WMDs, they fail to explain why the WMDs weren't launched within 45 minutes as Blair had claimed they could be, and why Iraq didn't use them on us in all the years that they were supposed to have had them.
I've also never seen or heard a precise definition of the term "weapons of mass destruction". It's a nice vague scary term that means whatever they want it to mean.
85
posted on
08/25/2003 1:06:59 PM PDT
by
alpowolf
Comment #86 Removed by Moderator
To: Poohbah
And the IRAQIS did so. So WTF did they do with it? After the first war they did. Even up until the mid 90s if I'm not mistaken. But that was then, this is now.
87
posted on
08/25/2003 1:07:21 PM PDT
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: billbears
I'm quite sure Hussein existed, from the footage, but I don't remember seeing footage of 30,000 munitions or thousands of tons of WMDs eitherNo. Of course you didn't. Not exactly something you'd expect for old Saddam to take picture of, is it? The FACT is that Iraq has used WMDs before and therefore DID at one point have them. Where did they go? Well, I don't know. But I do know where some of them went...
88
posted on
08/25/2003 1:07:23 PM PDT
by
RoughDobermann
(Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.)
To: billbears
I'm quite sure Hussein existed, from the footage, but I don't remember seeing footage of 30,000 munitions or thousands of tons of WMDs eitherNo. Of course you didn't. Not exactly something you'd expect for old Saddam to take picture of, is it? The FACT is that Iraq has used WMDs before and therefore DID at one point have them. Where did they go? Well, I don't know. But I do know where some of them went...
89
posted on
08/25/2003 1:07:24 PM PDT
by
RoughDobermann
(Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.)
To: RS
Hmmmm? Mosaad ..??
90
posted on
08/25/2003 1:07:53 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
To: Republican Red
Is World Tribune reputable?
I thought I'd answer my own question.
Report: U.S. Special Forces May Have Captured Osama Bin Laden [World Tribune, consider the source]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/903821/posts
To: RoughDobermann
"The significance of this sighting did not register on the CIA at the time"
I was upset when I first read this, but then I realized this was happening in January of 2003 right before we went to war - and I don't know that we would have had any authority to stop this movement. However, some of the previous UN sanctions, or resolutions (including 1441) might have given us the authority to stop the trucks, if the CIA had realized what was going on. Still .. I'm stunned the CIA didn't pick up on this. Why wouldn't this kind of movement have been a red flat ..?? Hmmmm?
Also .. what I want to know: WHAT DID FRANCE AND GERMANY KNOW ABOUT THIS MOVEMENT OF STUFF - and .. was this the reason for the stall in the UN - to allow this stuff to get moved.
92
posted on
08/25/2003 1:08:25 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
To: swarthyguy
Thank you for pointing this out. I, for one, appreciate Debka and I always have. Debka is right far more than they are given credit to on this board anyway. I ignore the old mantra about Debka. The NY Slimes and the Boston Globe have a better track record? Doubtfully!
To: cajungirl
Conservatives should wonder why we have people undermining the last best hope we have.The 'last best hope'? I just have to ask. What is that supposed to mean? Surely you are not suggesting that this administration is the last best hope for conservatism?
94
posted on
08/25/2003 1:09:13 PM PDT
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: billbears
Bush could personally take you to Saddam's WMD and you still wouldn't believe him.
95
posted on
08/25/2003 1:10:15 PM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
("Men stumble over the truth, but most pick themselves up as if nothing had happened." Churchill)
To: RoughDobermann
Instead they are located in Lebanon's heavily-fortified Bekaa Valley, swarming with Iranian and Syrian forces, and Hizbullah and ex-Iraqi agents A bomber pilot's dream.
96
posted on
08/25/2003 1:11:04 PM PDT
by
JohnnyZ
(Robot robot robot)
To: Peach
Peach, I think we won't have to go after anyone because they are coming after us. They are plotting and waiting and planning as we speak. They blew up that building in India, blew up the UN hotel, they will come and come. And we won't have to preemptively strike altho we should. I don't think they are going away at all.
97
posted on
08/25/2003 1:11:13 PM PDT
by
cajungirl
(no)
To: billbears; hchutch
After the first war they did. Even up until the mid 90s if I'm not mistaken. But that was then, this is now.Then: the Iraqis were required to fully account for their WMDs, and to ensure that they were destroyed under international supervision.
Now: After 12 years of reneging on their word, they got their a$$es whipped. Shiite happens.
They had an affirmative duty to fully account for the WMDs that they had admitted to having. The United States did not have that duty, the IRAQIS did. They did not do so.
98
posted on
08/25/2003 1:11:33 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
To: Donna Lee Nardo
Dittoes. They have been right on a number of occasions when what they reported is subsquently reported in a mainstream publication.
The US moving from Sultan AFbase in Saudi to Qatar, for instance.
And today's report in the Guardian citing Osama in Northern Pakistan/Kashmir. The uknowho said so in Sep/Oct 2001.
Many others, too.
To: Peach
Peach, I think we won't have to go after anyone because they are coming after us. They are plotting and waiting and planning as we speak. They blew up that building in India, blew up the UN hotel, they will come and come. And we won't have to preemptively strike altho we should. I don't think they are going away at all.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 241-256 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson