To: Theodore R.
His colleague Robert D.S. Novak seems to make the same error of judgment. Buchanan and Novak seem to regard Israel as the aggressor, rather than the one under attack.Hasn't it been Israel's policies in regard to their conquered territories that has fomented much of the universal animosity that Arabs hold for Israeli's. Isn't the U.S. viewed as culpable in the Arab mind, due to it's close association with Israel, it's vast military and financial support of Israel?
42 posted on
08/25/2003 7:15:34 AM PDT by
St.Chuck
To: St.Chuck
Hasn't it been Israel's policies in regard to their conquered territories that has fomented much of the universal animosity that Arabs hold for Israeli's.Nope. Arab animosity preceded the 1967 war--helll, it preceded the existence of Israel as a sovereign state--by a VERY long period of time.
73 posted on
08/25/2003 10:21:02 AM PDT by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
To: St.Chuck
You could go back 1000s of years. May I suggest 132 AD, the Bar Kochba rebellion, and come forward from there.
That would probably give you a good start for modern pan-Arab hatred of Jews.
To: St.Chuck
Hasn't it been Israel's policies in regard to their conquered territories that has fomented much of the universal animosity that Arabs hold for Israeli's.
Not a chance. You have bought a bushelful of Islamic lies to validate yourself. You omit the Muslim violence and Jihad prior to 1967 when Israel got the West Bank and Gaza.
RECOMMENDATION: Read a good history book on the Middle East.
97 posted on
08/25/2003 2:07:27 PM PDT by
dennisw
(G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson