Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Robert_Paulson2
having said that... I am done with you on this and leave you to your own very closely held "religous convictions" regarding moore and his marble...

Heh, I'm not done with you you pious little prick. I could care less about the monument, the Ten Commandments or Judge Roy Moore. You blow and steam about idolatry and commitment, not because these things mean anything to you. That's just your smokescreen for your "hate Judge Moore" campaign. Your little "more Christian than thou" trip.

Well this is about a lot more than your personal religious sanctimony or Judge Moore's! I don't care if he's a pompous ass or if he's playing the press for higher office or if he's just three bricks short of a load. None of those things strips him of Constitutional protection of his rights. If that guarantee is gone for those reasons, or the half baked reasons Thompson cites, then no has a guarantee.

As Thompson himself said in his ruling; "Chief Justice Moore has final authority over what decorations may be placed in the Judicial Building rotunda." The rest of the ruling is just excuses for ignoring that statement which grounds Judge Moore's right to exercise freedom of speech and religion in the manner that he did.

192 posted on 08/25/2003 4:00:23 PM PDT by TigersEye (Regime change in the Courts. - Impeach Activist Judges!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
Well, amen!
194 posted on 08/25/2003 4:10:06 PM PDT by PleaseNoMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson