To: Gdzine
Yes but the people that commissioned the SC art were not intending to forward their religion. According to the federal court we have to look to the artist or the person who commissioned the work to determine what their intentions were.
Probably the most stupid ruling I have ever heard of.
6 posted on
08/24/2003 7:40:59 PM PDT by
VRWC_minion
(Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and most are right)
To: VRWC_minion
According to the federal court we have to look to the artist or the person who commissioned the work to determine what their intentions were. Probably the most stupid ruling I have ever heard of.
Don't conservatives usually demand that the Supreme Court look at the framers of the Constitution in order to determine what their intentions were? That was Scalia's argument against declaring sodomy one of the Ninth Amendment rights.
33 posted on
08/24/2003 9:04:50 PM PDT by
SedVictaCatoni
(Court-defined religion = limited government?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson