So, the 7th Circuit in this case, came to the same conclusion as the 11th did, because of Moore's statements which explicitly refer to his rock as a religious display.
So, how do you explain Texas? Already litigated, and it was found to have a secular context.
To me, these cases are clear: no religious preference in public displays.
Would you be OK with a Koran in a Supreme Court building foyer?
Quite simply, one court has taken a more expansive reading of Lynch than the other. But don't worry the other will catch up.
To me, these cases are clear: no religious preference in public displays.
That would be Karl Marx' view as well. Karl Marx and current US law are coincident. Religion is banned from the public square. You might see that as desirable, I certainly don't.
Would you be OK with a Koran in a Supreme Court building foyer?
Of course. Nothing in the Constitution prevents the display of books in the foyer of the SCOTUS. Cripes.
Now if the SCOTUS began using it as precedent for opinions, I would urger them be impeached.
Just what is it that you are afraid of?