Posted on 08/24/2003 7:26:00 AM PDT by prarie earth
Much of (Arnolds) strategy is based on cross over appeal to non-Republican voters given his comparitvely moderate views on issues such as gun control, abortion and gay rights.
But less than two weeks into his first run for elected office, Schwarznegger has already become a politically polarizing figure.
Roughly seven in ten Democratic voters have an unfavorable impression of the action-movie star, while the same number of likely Republican voters expressed a favorable view.
The actor won the support of 39% of likely Republican voters, 20% of Independents, and 7% of Democrats polled.
McClintock recieved 21% of the Republican vote, Simon recieved 12% and Uberroth 10%.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
If they even vote at all. Tony Sanchez only managed slightly over 60% of Hispanics that voted in the gubernatorial race last year, but the Hispanic turnout was abysmal. President Bush might win over 50% of Hispanics in Texas next year. Too bad conservatives in California don't really care about winning (better to stick to principle and lose, right?) or George W. Bush might do something similar with the Hispanic vote there as well next year, possibly even winning their state.
Huh?
Did I say there was anything wrong with their support?
NO.
What I am saying is they are conservative congressman who did not put their fingers in the air, but came out for Schwarzenegger right off the bat.
This demonstrates that those here who shriek that "Arnold is a RINO" and say any Republican who supports him is just a RINO, are full of you-know-what.
Rush spanks all of you who are timid about pushing a conservative right now when the time is ripe to elect a REAL conservative.
California Needs ConservatismCalifornia is a liberal proving-ground run amok. Its crushing debt - resulting from years of pandering to unions, bureaucrats, illegal immigrants, environmentalists and trial lawyers - has led to huge tax increases, major cuts in basic services, a reduction in the state's credit rating, brown-outs, water shortages and a large exodus of citizens from the state.
None of this decay is surprising. The left's promises of Nirvana never measure up. But what does surprise me are the reactions of some conservatives who see California's problems as so severe that they can't be solved by the application of conservative principles. Their thinking has led them to support Arnold Schwarzenegger, who, to my knowledge, has yet to embrace any conservative positions, though he has embraced Warrent Buffett. Hasta la vista, whatever.
There's no better time to advance conservative principles than when they're most needed. And California needs a large dose of conservatism. Recent history should be our guide.
.
.
Conservatives need to learn from Ronald Reagan. They need to stop being timid, pessimistic, and insecure. California needs solutions. There is no better time and place to establish and illustrate the primacy of conservatism. True, not all of California's problems mirror those of the late '70s and '80s, but many do, particularly those that forced this recall. Now, if one man with a vision completely changed the course of a nation, why can't it happen in a single state?
-Rush Limbaugh, Wall Street Journal, 20 August 2003
Obviously, Rush is saying that we need a true conservative and one with vision. And he makes it clear that it isn't Arnold who, he says, "has yet to embrace any conservative positions."
Rush doesn't rehabilitate Arnold much at all in the whole 'Arnold Got His (Conservative) Groove Back' thing. Far from it. Rush's support of Arnold's alleged conservative credentials it as tepid as Coulter's. So Arnold brought in Schultz? And?! That certainly doesn't immediately make him a conservative. Other people he's brought into his campaign detract from the conservative illusion. For example, he's brought in A. Jerrold Perenchio, the leftist CEO of the Univision and a long-time Davis supporter.
And I'm now going to add another bullet to the list of Arnold's non-conservative views:
Last year, while campaigning for his Prop. 49 after-school programs initiative, Schwarzenegger...declared in answer to a question from the audience: "I would never stand in the way of any child going to school, whether he or she is here legally or illegally, it does not matter." - Sacramento Bee, 24 August
I'm thinking bustamonte is the best choice. If Arnold isn't conservative and McClintock unelectable, then sadly but surely what California needs is an orgy of liberal policies that brings the fever to a boil. Neither Arnold nor McClintock could reform the state in two years given a democratic legislature. So, I think you need to crash the whole system.
McClintock 331 votes - 50%
Schwarzenegger 292 votes - 44%
Other 11 votes - 1%
Undecided 23 votes - 3%
If this were a Republican primary and only Freepers voted, I'd have to suggest, "Asta La Vista, Arnold".
Don't they count? Why is their support continuously ignored?
I think I get it, cyn. Rohrbacher and Dreier have actually been elected to office in California - therefore they aren't pure enough to be considered anything but RINOS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.