Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: missyme
First let me say we agree on much. However,I am particularly concerned that the media,the education system and others,among them some gay bishops and priests want to "normalize" homosexuality.

To do that they need to destroy the moral authority of the Catholic Church. How better to do that then to have a sex scandal,preferably one that involves children,this to assure the "masses" get worked up. BTW,I know I am overgeneralizing here but it is the primary causes and effects that I am trying to identify and address. Back to point,they knew,what many of us were unaware of,that pedophilia is a sickness and probably in most cases incurable.They also knew that most pedophiles are heterosexual or bisexual and the bi's,because so many were married,would look to the average observer as a heterosexual..

So the plan was,follow the chronology,was ensure a boatload of abusers,and when the numbers reach "critical mass" expose the numbers and hide the ages.Because they also knew that 90% of the abuses were "chickenhawks" lookng to kill two birds with one stone. Chickenhawks satisfy their desire for youth and beauty and can recruit young men into the homosexual community with the very same act. They counted on the label of pedophile and the average Americans lack of knowledge to create an outburst that would destroy the priesthood and the Church's moral authority.

That is why it is so emportant to separate the two types of crimes that are sailing under the label of pedophilia and shout out that it is the homosexuals who are the problem that must be dealt with first. I hope you will consider what I have said and not allow "celibacy" to become the issue. If they can fool people into thinking married priests are the answer,they buy more time. Most people don't need more time,they need to get active and denounce those who say that it is a fine alternatuve life style. It is not,it is a death style.

646 posted on 08/24/2003 10:40:55 AM PDT by saradippity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies ]


To: saradippity
Great comments on your posting and I do agree with quite a bit of what you said. I feel that Under the Umbrella of Sexual peversion is: Homosexuals, pedophiles, peeping toms, bisexuality and beastiality.

Heterosexuals that are married and involve themselves in adulterous affairs are not necesarilly perverts as they have broken there vows to there spouse and to G-D.
I am also saying that Heterosexuals that are single and practice sexual relations with multiple partners, risk disease, unwanted pregnancys and broken hearts where there is no commitment with a person, these practices although are not peversions.

I guess what I am saying is that are best bet as leaders in the church would be Married Heterosexuals.

653 posted on 08/24/2003 10:56:21 AM PDT by missyme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson