Replies

You all forget that some imprisoned beast got his jollies by committing another murder in prison.

I am more concerned about the punishment of the beast for murdering behind bars than I am concerned about a child-molester getting what is coming to him.

It is a sick set of circumstances when a "justice" sytem refrains from taking the official responsibility of executing a child molester or other criminal, then seemingly turns its back while under its very nose, prisoners torture and murder each other.

If you believe the murdered prisoner should be killed for his crimes, than you should be complaining that the "justice" system did not give him the death penalty.

And you should, with equal fervor, demand the criminal who murdered (and probably tortured him) also be given the death penalty.

I'd complain ---- but I think this is in Massachusetts --- a very liberal state with very lax penalties for crimes like child rape and murder. But you still don't know the murderer of this Geoghan didn't have to kill him out of self-defense.

What I would do is offer physical castration to anyone who fondles a child, and to anyone who thinks they might have a problem in their attraction to children. If they fondle another child or in any other way harm a child, then it would be the death penalty.