Whatcha all think?
1 posted on
08/22/2003 8:10:51 PM PDT by
DittoJed2
To: DittoJed2
I think it was the internet worm
2 posted on
08/22/2003 8:12:56 PM PDT by
woofie
To: DittoJed2
I think we don't know yet!The theories are interesting but this will take time to sort out.The primary problem is the safety measures not working to protect against this cascading major outages.
4 posted on
08/22/2003 8:23:05 PM PDT by
MEG33
To: DittoJed2
Homer Simpson at the controls ?
5 posted on
08/22/2003 8:26:39 PM PDT by
stylin19a
(is it vietnam yet ?)
To: DittoJed2
11 posted on
08/22/2003 8:46:01 PM PDT by
Samwise
(There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the will of evil.)
To: DittoJed2
WORM. The internet went nuts at the same time. AMTRAK still FUGED UP! Another set to run today. IM signing off till Monday.
...well till Saturday morning anyway.
13 posted on
08/22/2003 8:56:50 PM PDT by
JOE6PAK
(Ambivalent? Well, yes and no.)
To: DittoJed2
I think it will turn out to be a three to five unrelated, relatively normal, no-big-deal-by-itself, things that happened to be going on at the same time.
I've seen multi-cause errors a number of times in the space business, where unrelated problems come together to make life very interesting.
14 posted on
08/22/2003 8:58:49 PM PDT by
r9etb
To: DittoJed2
19 posted on
08/22/2003 9:23:08 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(Socialism is slavery)
To: DittoJed2
This situation is beginning to look a lot like the Big Northeast Power Failure of the 60s.
After that failure, they determined that the overloads of the interconnect lines were set too high, allowing an abnormally large load in one part of the system to drag other systems down. The talk of overloaded power lines heating enough to strech and sag, and one part of the system draging down another, sounds like the overloads were set too high.
In the event of an overload in one section of the interconnected system, the interconnect lines are supposed to interrupt, isolating the problem to one small area.
After the 60s event, all the overload relays in the system were adjusted to lower values, to enable the system to shed the problem areas as it was supposed to.
Over the years, I suppose that overloads were increased so as to not be a bother.
To: DittoJed2
bump
29 posted on
08/22/2003 11:14:12 PM PDT by
Captain Beyond
(The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
To: DittoJed2
Multiple FailuresPJM Interconnection and American Electric, among others, sealed themselves off from FirstEnergy keeping the lights on in Boston, Philadelphia and other cities. This article says Detroit didn't seal themselves off which spread into Ontario and then New York. Though they don't say, it seems like Ontario and New York should have also separated themselves.
I can buy that FirstEnergy failed on a large scale. (There are various stories of their persistent shortcomings in recent months.) But how does that explain Michigan, Ontario and New York failing while PJM and others were able to separate themselves?
30 posted on
08/22/2003 11:19:19 PM PDT by
Dolphy
To: DittoJed2
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson