Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rustbucket
I'm glad too, but the point is that the "no establishment" clause doesn't mean what the contemporary courts say it means.
257 posted on 08/22/2003 4:17:09 PM PDT by My2Cents ("I'm the party pooper..." -- Arnold in "Kindergarten Cop.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]


To: My2Cents
Even though my child goes to private school, I'm still forced to pay taxes toward the "public" schools and they teach moral principles which offend me.
275 posted on 08/22/2003 4:23:12 PM PDT by Helix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

To: My2Cents
I'm glad too, but the point is that the "no establishment" clause doesn't mean what the contemporary courts say it means.

You may well be correct. Six states had some form of establishment after the Revolution. They gradually dropped them, a wise move I think. Massachussetts did so in 1833.

In America we avoided the insanity that had gone on in Europe with its wars of religion, where Catholics burned Protestants at the stake and Protestants desecrated Catholic churches. Indeed, Catholic/Protestant strife is still going on in parts of Europe.

In America some states established particular denominations, while others favored Protestant churches in general. Maryland established Christian churches in general so that Catholic churches could be included. Others, like Rhode Island, had separation of church and state. Imagine trying to force all that together. Thank goodness for the First Amendment.

380 posted on 08/22/2003 5:05:22 PM PDT by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson