Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
Irrelevent. Hillary, if elected, will do whatever she damn well pleases regardless of what the law allows or prohibits. Why would a lawless one be constrained by a lack of legal authority?

EXACTLY RIGHT, DUGWAY!

What the handwringers don't realize is that without this law, the chances for another 9/11 style attack are increased--and when that happens, the handwringers will be among those calling for the heads of the "incompetent administration" that didn't "put the pieces together" of the complex web of terrorist cells and their activities. Gone for a long time will be the cries of the ACLU, Patrick Leahy, and even the so-called libertarians.

32 posted on 08/24/2003 4:55:30 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: Recovering_Democrat
Thank you. To me, this argument that such laws give too much power to Hillary are the most ridiculous argument since the argument must be based upon the assumption that Hillary won't do anything against the law.
33 posted on 08/24/2003 7:38:37 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson