To: Byron_the_Aussie
Not when the principle being asserted is wrong.
49 posted on
08/22/2003 5:56:10 AM PDT by
Chancellor Palpatine
("what if the hokey pokey is really what its all about?" - Jean Paul Sartre)
To: Chancellor Palpatine
Th Principle being asserted on the National Stage is correct.
The vigorous advocacy of the establishment of Secular Humanism, by the likes of the ACLU,SLPC, and AUSCS is the principle being attacked by Moore. These little scumbags are reading and litigating things into the law that Have NEVER Existed. Alan Keyes reiterated the point last night, that Many STATES had their own Established Religions at the time of the enactment of the First Amendment.
IF people want to live in an atheistic society, that is fine, but it should be brought about openly and debated, not in the selective atmosphere of carefully chosen court venues.
And to be honest, I think state courts should start forcing these kinds of battles to a jury/community standards issue.
If that were to happen this ACLU inspired idiocy would end toot-sweet.
177 posted on
08/22/2003 7:54:40 AM PDT by
hobbes1
( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson