Bustamonte is a liberal with a "D" next to his name.
I don't see the difference.
Besides, Arnold gives no specifics or details on what his full governing agenda will look like. And according to Arnold himself, he has no intention of giving out any details until after the election. That's not the sign of a good politician. That's the sign of a desperate novice.
Cruz Bustamante tried to become governor by having a kangaroo committee appoint him.
As the FrontPageMag.com writer said, Bustamante had to be reminded, California is not Mexico--yet.
Bustamante has not repudiated his affiliation with MEChA with its motto "For the race, everything; for those outside the race, nothing."
Then there was Cruz' public use of the n-----s epithet--which seems to have drawn no criticism from the liberal press which crucified Lott for much less.
Democrat registration exceeds Republican by over a million voters--plus, Democrats know how to cheat (Loretta Sanchez v. Bob Dornan).
California has a Democrat governor, two Democrat senators, and a Democrat legislature; McClintock has less chance at winning than General Custer.
Arnold is a successful businessman who will audit before correcting the mess Davis has made.
He will win, and he will pull California's economy out of its death spiral.