That was your statement. That would include the founding fathers.
Refusing to allow a piece of rock to be erected in a public place in no way compares to taxation without representation, murdering citizens, etc.
It is a perfect comparison to having a state mandated church like the Church of England.
Yes it was. And I stand by it.
That would include the founding fathers.
No, it doesn't. There is a world of difference between taxation without representation, et al and not being able to pay for a hunk of rock out of public funds.
It is a perfect comparison to having a state mandated church like the Church of England.
Care to explain this one a bit more completely?