[Amelia]

If anything, it would be more accurate to say Judge Moore's rights are being violated. He is being prohibited from the free exercise of his religion.

I don't have a problem with the Ten Commandments monument, and I don't think it's unconstitutional, but I don't think your argument will fly...

If another judge wanted to put up a Wiccan or Buddhist or Hindu monument next to Judge Moore's monument (which is on public property, not the Judge's personal property), would you say the other Judge had a right to free exercise of his religion as well?

[Texas Eagle]

If another judge wanted to put up a Wiccan or Buddhist or Hindu monument next to Judge Moore's monument (which is on public property, not the Judge's personal property), would you say the other Judge had a right to free exercise of his religion as well?

Yes. Would the ACLU?

[c-b 1]

If another judge wanted to put up a Wiccan or Buddhist or Hindu monument next to Judge Moore's monument (which is on public property, not the Judge's personal property), would you say the other Judge had a right to free exercise of his religion as well?

I suspect the Liberal Judge Myron Thompson would rule that it was OK.

[Luis Gonzalez]

Judger Moore already turned down requests from citizens of Alabama who wanted to put up just the sorts of displays you mentioned.

I guess the building is his now.