[WOSG]

"You posted judicial activism run amok. Now I know you don't have a problem with judicial activists but that's what you posted."

LOL ... a good retort.


BTW, with all this high falutin 'high wall' stuff, I have yet to see a single post that indicates anyone citing someone actually HARMED by this display. Not liking it cause you cant abide them 'bible thumpers' doesnt count!

[jwalsh07]

BTW, with all this high falutin 'high wall' stuff, I have yet to see a single post that indicates anyone citing someone actually HARMED by this display. Not liking it cause you cant abide them 'bible thumpers' doesnt count!

That's because the other side is arguing about collective affronts to feelings instead of the abridgement of an individuals right to worship.

For argument's sake, let them theoretically impeach Judge Moore. Then we can get to the heart of the matter.

Is the display of the Ten Commandments constitutionally protected or not.

What do you think General?

[lugsoul]

Guess what? The Establishment Clause doesn't say anything about anyone being harmed - the state can't adopt a religion even if every single citizen supports it.

Your disregard for the Constitution becomes more apparent with every post.