There would still have to be an official organization, otherwise anybody could just up and call himself an imam.
Anyway - the idea that their are some faiths with fall within "thereof" which do not fall within "religion" is among the most tortured Constitutional constructions I've seen, and is worthy of none other than William O. Douglas in its lack of textual support.
That's not what I said. I said that a "faith" is not a religion. Religions are modes of worship, and the organizations centered around them. There's only a slight variation of context between the two clauses that are influenced by the surrounding words. You seem to be reading way more into my statements than there actually is.
Yep. That would be the case. Though not everyone would have to agree, or listen to him. It is more of a bottom-up thing than a top-down thing.