Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG
As for the 10 Commandment display, it should be permissible under any Judicial regimen that properly allows a place for official recognition in voluntary, open ways of religious sentiment or religious heritage on our culture.

"Voluntary, open" - see, we weren't that far apart after all ;)

1,060 posted on 08/22/2003 12:55:25 PM PDT by general_re (A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1057 | View Replies ]


To: general_re
As for the 10 Commandment display, it should be permissible under any Judicial regimen that properly allows a place for official recognition in voluntary, open ways of religious sentiment or religious heritage on our culture. "Voluntary, open" - see, we weren't that far apart after all ;)

Glad to see the comity. Okay, but I say Judge Moore's display - and the many dozens of similar Ten Commandment displays around the country, on legal seals and on buildings/courthouses, *and* the village naivity scenes - are LEGAL. They dont violate establishment clause.

Are you agreeing to *that*?

1,064 posted on 08/22/2003 1:04:14 PM PDT by WOSG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1060 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson