[general_re]

You know as well as I do that "not necessarily" is a sophist statement.

I didn't produce the mess that is First Amendment law - don't shoot the messenger ;)

[WOSG]

I think much of the prolem is that notion that recent judicial opinions (eg since 1963) is "First Amendment law" as opposed to more accurately "what Federal Judges have recently opined on the First Amendment".

Then you dont have to "own" that mess at all - it's a mess created by the Brennanite Liberal Judges!