[WOSG]

"Neither your freedom of expression nor Judge Roy Moore's requires that you be given the unfettered use of the resources of the state to exercise your freedom of expression. "

Strawman and further evasion of my question.

What is "unfettered" about one room, and one monument?
And if it was *donated*, does that make it better and therefore legal?

[lugsoul]

If the monument does not present any constitutional problem, why could it not be paid for out of the state treasury?

[lugsoul]

Fine - change my choice of words to "fettered or unfettered." I don't care. Your free exercise does not have to be state-supported. And neither does Judge Moore's. Nor mine.