[lugsoul]

Now you are just playing silly semantic games. I STILL disagree with your premise. If lack of belief in religion is a "religious belief" then, by your logic, an organization of non-believers is a "religion." I don't buy it. So your question is meaningless to me. But, to get to the core of what you were asking, I repeat again that the Bill of Rights is not religious law, and the Sharia is.

[inquest]

If lack of belief in religion is a "religious belief" then, by your logic, an organization of non-believers is a "religion."

So are you saying they're not entitled to the protection of the first amendment?