Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justlurking
But, this doesn't mitigate my concerns about the process.

If it did, I'd expect the Pope to announce his conversion to Judaism soon after.

There's nothing in there about contacting him before conducting the uannounced audit.

The absence of that fact in the article does not constitute proof that it didn't happen.

And that brings us back to the original issue: did the BSA treat him fairly, or did they single him out to set an example? He thinks the latter is the case, and you appear to believe that was a possibility.

It depends on the evidence from the ex-employee which prompted the investigation in the first place. We simply don't know the content of that evidence. And speculating on it is useless.

Given the history of this case, I could apparently pick up the phone and make an anonymous call to the BSA and claim that a competitor is illegally copying software. If I can convince them I'm an employee (or ex-employee), I can shut my competitor down.

Wouldn't work. You'd be in no position to know that the competitor was using illegal software.
333 posted on 08/22/2003 12:05:36 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies ]


To: Bush2000
Drug raids are launched in this country based on anonymous tips.
335 posted on 08/22/2003 12:11:00 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]

To: Bush2000
If it did, I'd expect the Pope to announce his conversion to Judaism soon after.

Are you this antagonistic face-to-face? If so, is it really productive, or do most people just dismiss you? If not, why do you think it's acceptable here? Because you can be anonymous?

The absence of that fact in the article does not constitute proof that it didn't happen.

Nor does it constitute proof that it did. You really have to learn that you can't have it both ways.

It depends on the evidence from the ex-employee which prompted the investigation in the first place. We simply don't know the content of that evidence. And speculating on it is useless.

The owner claims it was an anonymous call by someone who claimed to be an ex-employee. If that's true, I really do wonder about the quality of the evidence.

Wouldn't work. You'd be in no position to know that the competitor was using illegal software.

You missed this part:

If I can convince them I'm an employee (or ex-employee), I can shut my competitor down.

337 posted on 08/22/2003 12:27:46 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson