To: F16Fighter
I'm curious why no one from the ultra-conservative wing here can have a civil discussion on such a heated subject without quickly resorting to juvenile insinuations, mendacious bloviating, and blatant misrepresentation.
131 posted on
08/22/2003 11:29:10 AM PDT by
tdadams
To: tdadams
...why no one from the ultra-conservative wing here can have a civil discussion...Why would you post such a ridiculous statement?
I'm an ultr-conservative and you, sir, are no ultra-conservative.
To: tdadams
I'm curious why no one from the ultra-conservative wing here can have a civil discussion...Now you're saying you didn't say this?
How is the sophomore class this year? Study hard and perhaps you'll complete it.
I don't know where high school students get all the time to sit around most of the day posting nonsense.
To: tdadams
"I'm curious why no one from the ultra-conservative wing here can have a civil discussion on such a heated subject without quickly resorting to juvenile insinuations, mendacious bloviating, and blatant misrepresentation."Put some ice on it, Nancy. This ain't the DU, is it?
156 posted on
08/22/2003 3:26:11 PM PDT by
F16Fighter
(Shhhh...Watch and Listen -- The New World (State) Order is trying sneak in through the back door.)
To: tdadams
I'm curious why no one from the ultra-conservative wing here can have a civil discussion on such a heated subject without quickly resorting to juvenile insinuations, mendacious bloviating, and blatant misrepresentation.That’s because you always fire the first shot. You want to start over and have a civil discussion let’s do it, I’ll be the first to apologize if I offend you, just let me know. Your decline will be an impeachment of your statement.
Let’s start with a discussion on how this psychiatric problem began shall we?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson